Pages: [1] |
1. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Marranar Amatin wrote: its actually a lot worse than 3 drones, if it were 3 drones then it would not be possible to reduce their damage by 50% by damaging them to 50%. And it would be possible to repair them back to 100% without buying new ones...
- by Robertina Palazzo - at 2016.07.02 20:36:59
|
2. Sticky:[Citadels] Carriers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
I do have to ask why pvpers claim "carebears" cry and whine and want safety yet cry every time something requires setup to kill until it is nerfed back into free kb stats? If you have to cry and throw a tantrum because something is "too hard" to ...
- by Robertina Palazzo - at 2016.07.02 02:50:03
|
3. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Morrigan LeSante wrote: Momiji Yakumo wrote: Morrigan LeSante wrote: Momiji Yakumo wrote: Just saying~ You know you broke carriers when carrier ratting brings you almost the same isk per tick as a battleship You're doing it wrong. ...
- by Robertina Palazzo - at 2016.07.02 01:14:56
|
4. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: There are plenty of ships that hard-counter other ships if one or the other is used well or the other incorrectly. Speed tanking Frigates have hard-countered Battleships for years, for example, that's why you either ne...
- by Robertina Palazzo - at 2016.07.01 23:30:50
|
5. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
I just laugh when people post how now t3 destroyers and cruisers godmode vs carriers and people say "working as intended" How is godmoding against anything working as intended? A carrier fields only "light" fighters and "general" light fighters,...
- by Robertina Palazzo - at 2016.07.01 03:47:50
|
6. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
C0ATL wrote: I just love how people flying Covert Ops BS are complaining about not being able to make a FREE and EASY meal out of a carrier since the capital patch. One word to those imbeciles: ADAPT. I've seen a Thanatos being taken down ...
- by Robertina Palazzo - at 2016.06.29 01:24:05
|
7. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: The ISD don't remove posts for content, if they did this thread would be three pages long. In short it wasn't what you said it was how you said it... I said what i will keep on saying. HAW's are for subcaps just l...
- by Robertina Palazzo - at 2016.06.28 17:37:45
|
8. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: HAWs are a lot easier to counter, and have a lot more counters, than Light Fighters nuking small ships off the grid easily and effortlessly. If you don't want posts getting removed then read and apply the forum rules....
- by Robertina Palazzo - at 2016.06.28 16:11:48
|
9. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dirk Stetille wrote: This nerf? Bad idea. Carriers just became useless at hitting small stuff, which makes them almost completely useless in general. No PvE for carrier pilots, and PvP is relegated to BS and below, cause there's no way they can...
- by Robertina Palazzo - at 2016.06.28 14:24:04
|
10. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
ApolloF117 HUN wrote: Wonder if devs do even read the forum, or they just listen to crybaby's and make their own decision regardless of looking at anything what others say what is the real problem. Just a quick question, why didn't t3s got nerf...
- by Robertina Palazzo - at 2016.06.28 12:42:51
|
11. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Can we at least get light fighter regular damage buffed since you know.... they nerfed missile salvo burst by a huge margin AND application as well? or will that get nerfed too because frigates cant kill carriers easily enough again? Morriga...
- by Robertina Palazzo - at 2016.06.28 11:45:05
|
12. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Nasar Vyron wrote: Can all us carrier pilots start bitching for a 4th fighter tube for support squadrons only now? Also a buff to them while we're at it as they are very lackluster right now. It worked for the small gang to get LFs nerfed becau...
- by Robertina Palazzo - at 2016.06.25 05:52:23
|
13. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
So wait, just because interceptors werent invincible any more carriers get nerfed into a "dont bother pvping in me" class ship? Kden.
- by Robertina Palazzo - at 2016.06.25 01:43:44
|
14. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Anthar Thebess wrote: I have no problem that carriers will die. Current fighter bombers even ensure that carrier will die - people use them in battles as they are useful. Slow but useful. All groups start to evolve to 3 fleets working togeth...
- by Robertina Palazzo - at 2016.06.23 07:36:22
|
15. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Anthar Thebess wrote: Sorry, but "ships dying even when we have 30 logistic ships on grid" is not a problem. This 30 logistics repairing 1 ship is more cancerous than carrier sitting on lowsec gate. Nothing should be untouchable - and bigges...
- by Robertina Palazzo - at 2016.06.23 07:03:13
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |